Building Decisions in Urban Conservation Plans � Giresun Example

The decisions about the built environment and the building codes in urban conservation plans have a critical role for a true conservation practice. Besides the necessity of planning decisions that are formed according to a holistic conservation policy, the building regulations and codes have direct effects in sustaining the characteristic and authentic features of the built environment. In urban conservation areas, buildings can be categorized in three groups: cultural assets that are already registered as heritage sites, existing buildings that do not present heritage value and proposed buildings that do not exist currently. The conservation law in Turkey provides a specific mechanism for monitoring and controlling registered heritage sites; however, this mechanism is quite limited for unregistered or new buildings in urban conservation areas. Therefore, within urban conservation plans, the decisions about the unregistered or new buildings become a primary challenge for the protection of authentic physical features in urban areas. Urbanization over the traditional urban area of Giresun dating to the late 19th and early 20th centuries has created obvious integration problems between new and old sites. The limited registration for traditional buildings, the insufficiency in codes and limitations for new buildings, the lack of a holistic planning policy, and the existence of unharmonious new buildings within and around the urban conservation area are the current problems in Giresun. These problems have been mainly caused by the building decisions of former urban conservation plans. This paper aims to share and argue the principles and decisions of the Revision Plan of Giresun Urban Conservation Area.

Keywords: Planning, urban conservation, conservation planning

Koruma Ama�l� Planlarda Yap�la�ma Kararlar� - Giresun �rne�i

Ceyhan Y�cel
Erciyes �niversitesi Mimarl�k Fak�ltesi �ehir Ve B�lge Planlama B�l�m�, Kayseri

Koruma ama�l� imar planlar�nda yap�la�ma kararlar�, ba�ar�l� bir koruma prati�i ger�ekle�tirilmesinde �ncelikli konulardand�r. B�t�nc�l ve kapsay�c� bir koruma politikas� ve bu politikaya ba�l� olarak al�nm�� planlama kararlar�n�n �nceli�i yan�nda, korunmaya konu mek�n�n �zg�n/otantik niteliklerin ya�at�lmas�nda yap�la�maya y�nelik kararlar do�rudan etkilidir. Korunacak kentsel alanlarda yap�la�maya y�nelik kararlarda ba�l�ca �� yap� kategorisi ortaya ��kmaktad�r: K�lt�r varl�� olarak tescilli yap�lar, dokuda i�inde yer alan ancak tescile konu olmayan mevcut yap�lar ve doku i�inde yeni yap�lacak yap�lar. Koruma mevzuat�m�z tescilli k�lt�r varl�klar�na ili�kin uygulama, izleme ve denetleme mekanizmas�n� olu�turmu� durumdad�r; ancak tescil d�� olan ta��nmazlarda ya da yeni yap�lacak yap�larda bu mekanizma olduk�a k�s�tl�d�r. Bu a��dan, koruma ama�l� imar planlar�nda yap�la�maya y�nelik kararlar, doku karakterinin do�ru bir �ekilde korunmas� ve dokunun otantik niteliklerinin s�rd�r�lebilmesi i�in ba�l�ca ara�lar haline gelmektedir. 19. y�zy�l sonu ve 20. y�zy�l ba��na tarihlenen yap�lardan olu�an Giresun geleneksel kent dokusu �zerinde kentle�menin yaratt�� tehditler, zaman i�erisinde eski ve yeni doku aras�nda b�t�nle�me sorunlar� yaratm��t�r. Geleneksel binalar�n tescilinin eksik yap�lm�� olmas�, yeni yap�lacak binalar i�in gerekli yap�la�ma ko�ullar�n�n ve k�s�tlamalar�n yetersizli�i, b�t�nc�l bir planlama politikas�n�n eksikli�i ve geleneksel doku i�erisinde ve �evresinde dokuya ayk�r� yeni yap�la�ma �rnekleri, Giresun kentsel koruma alanlar�nda ortaya ��kan ba�l�ca sorunlard�r. Buradan hareketle, Giresun Kentsel Sit Alan� ve Koruma Alanlar� i�in haz�rlanan Koruma Ama�l� Revizyon �mar Plan��nda yap�la�maya y�nelik belirlenmi� ilke ve kararlar�n payla��lmas� ve tart��lmas� amac�yla bu �al��ma haz�rlanm��t�r.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Planlama, kentsel koruma, koruma ama�l� planlama

Ceyhan Y�cel. Building Decisions in Urban Conservation Plans � Giresun Example. Megaron. 2017; 12(1): 106-119

Corresponding Author: Ceyhan Y�cel, T�rkiye

TOOLS

Full Text PDF

Download citation

RIS

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

Procite

Reference Manager

Share with email

Send email to author

Similar articles

PubMed

Google Scholar